Last year was my twenty-fifth college reunion and my
thirtieth high school reunion.
Twenty-five years? Thirty
years? How did that happen? I stare at those numbers in disbelief, partly
because the time seems to have passed so quickly and partly because of the
implications they have for me. Does this
mean I’m getting old? Worse, does it mean I am old? Perish the thought!
They say that age is a state of mind. They also say it’s just a number. Whatever else it may be, it’s a concept that
is applied differently in different cases.
Think, for example, of a seventy-five year old piece of furniture. (Maybe something you saw in YesterNook last
week.) We typically hear these kinds of
responses to such an object:
“It’s a classic!”
“They don’t make ‘em like that any more!”
“It’s so solid that it probably has that many more years
of use left in it.”
“Sure doesn’t look its age.”
How many of those same sentiments are typically applied
to a seventy-five year old person? Now, this is not an essay about society’s
attitude towards the aging (even though we’re all aging every day). This really isn’t the place for that sort of
thing. I won’t even get into the way
that the term “antique” implies value and worth when it’s applied to
objects. Instead, I want to offer a
paradigm shift of sorts.
From now on, I’m dealing with my encroaching old age as
if I were a piece of furniture. You can
play along too, if you like.
I’m not old. I’m
vintage.
I’m not aging. I’m
becoming a classic example of my era.
Those aren’t age spots.
They’re patina.
Those aren’t wrinkles.
They’re distressed details.
I am not sagging and bagging in places. I have classic lines.
And, of course, I don’t look my age. Plus, I’m so solid I still have many more
years of use left.
Come on down to YesterNook this weekend and see lots of
furniture, accessories, and other collectibles that are just like me!
Amen sister! I totally agree with this train of thought. Could not have said it better myself.
ReplyDelete